> like day-to-day survival Getting their square meals every day isn't the challenge for them. Even the meth tweakers eat. > why not start with the lowest-cost

> like day-to-day survival Getting their square meals every day isn't the challenge for them. Even the meth tweakers eat. > why not start with the lowest-cost interventions? I don't think housing is the lowest-cost intervention > Ignoring, for the moment, the question of whether people should be obliged to in order to continue living No one is obliged to in the Western world, such is the safety net.