4 ms·
Is it a problem with the reactive style in general, or only when you try to connect it to systems not designed with this style in mind?
by esperent 4y ago
Is it a problem with the reactive style in general, or only when you try to connect it to systems not designed with this style in mind?
- munchbunny 4y agoIf I’m someone who just wants to get an app out the door, then I’d argue that not being able to gracefully bridge to other paradigms when there is a gap in what is available under a reactive pattern is by itself a problem (an ecosystem problem). That’s why I use React. Despite the issues with bridging to non-reactive abstractions, it remains a useful pattern. Others may be more concerned with the applicability of the pattern itself.
- pygy_ 4y agoThis is not unlike integrated automatically GC'd and non-GC'd code. The gap can be bridged for granular reactive systems as it can be for React, provided the reactive system is well designed.