3 ms·
It's a shame this filesystem never received the attention it deserved, it was a bit ahead of its time and IBM should have dedicated more resources to it. Years
by Sunspark 4y ago
It's a shame this filesystem never received the attention it deserved, it was a bit ahead of its time and IBM should have dedicated more resources to it. Years ago JFS was quite performant on low-resources machines and it was certainly superior over stuff like EXT2, etc. imo.
I suppose it occupied the same awkward niche that ZFS does, another good filesystem that has had its adoption hindered.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]