3 ms·
If it's so deadly and widely asymptomatic until it's way too late, why don't we screen for it? Or is that problem, that we don't have a good screening test othe
by nerdponx 4y ago
If it's so deadly and widely asymptomatic until it's way too late, why don't we screen for it? Or is that problem, that we don't have a good screening test other than expensive and time consuming MRI?
- Broken_Hippo 4y agoScreening isn't really helpful because it isn't good enough. We find all of these lesions, but the vast majority don't result in anything that needs treated nor do they appear to have symptoms. They are just there. So right now, we just watch them. I'm guessing if we knew how common they were, could better tell between normal and cancerous, or heck, even knew why they were so common, we could do better. But we just aren't there yet. And unfortunately, this is the case for a number or screenings - and is a downside of some routine screenings. I keep hoping that once we understand a variety of cancer better, this will improve. FWIW, mine was found on a CT scan and all the monitoring was on an MRI - and both expensive (thankfully the out of pocket costs for healthcare here are low) and uncomfortable for some folks.