4 ms·
That's a bad example, it's fully rational and chatGPT gets that "It's still the same beer but the location and atmosphere of the resort may justify the higher p
by lossolo 4y ago
That's a bad example, it's fully rational and chatGPT gets that "It's still the same beer but the location and atmosphere of the resort may justify the higher price.", you are not paying only for beer there, you have location and atmosphere included in that price, that's why alcohol price is so high in night clubs. You can go buy the beer and go home or you can go to fancy resort and drink beer there, experience will be different and that experience is included in the price of the beer.
- bilsbie 4y agoNot sure if it was clear but the friend is bringing you the beer. So you wouldn’t experience either location. The end result would be identical.
- LarryMullins 4y agoThe language model wants to spend $5 on beer but is willing to spend up to $10 if you give it no other choice. It understands a beach resort with a local beer monopoly is probably charging more, and correctly explains why that is. Seems mostly rational to me. The irrational part is where it didn't answer the initial "How much would you want to spend?" query with a preference for free beer. The thought of paying less than $5 for beer apparently didn't occur to it. Maybe it's snooty.