3 ms·

jt2190's post suggests the user is posting his/her own code, but not necessarily wanting to open source it to the world. If the code is yours, NDA and licensin

jt2190's post suggests the user is posting his/her own code, but not necessarily wanting to open source it to the world. If the code is yours, NDA and licensing are irrelevant in that situation. "if Git is used already in the company's development process, the candidate would need to show that he or she is familiar with Git" Any company that requires a potential hire to be familiar with their current source control system is an insanely stupid organization.

xxqs 15y ago
well, Git mastering requires time for training, and this involves additional costs. Besides, seeing how someone organizes their work in branches is a good help in understanding the developer's culture. The quality of commits is also quite important: granularity, good descriptions, focus -- all these things would be easier to learn from a public Git repository before making the hiring decision.
- Drbble 15y ago
  Sure, but that is nowhere close to what your first post said, unless you think git is the only scm.
  - xxqs 15y ago
    ok, let's rephrase it: If Git is in use and the candidate has experience with it, it's a benefit for both parties, and can influence the hiring decision