Nobody is saying it, but I will: of course that Google being a gigantic company doesn't help, but what imo really seals the deal in terms of them not being inno

Nobody is saying it, but I will: of course that Google being a gigantic company doesn't help, but what imo really seals the deal in terms of them not being innovative enough is the fact that most of the people now working there are in for the money and money alone. In the past we've had pretty big companies/organisations that used to be quite innovative, I'm thinking of Xerox, HP, Bell, even Intel at some point, to say nothing of the various departments attached to the US industrial-military complex (starting with NASA), but then the people innovating back then hadn't joined those companies/organisations mostly for the money and money alone. Get rid of the people who have joined Alphabet only to get the 500-600k yearly comp and you could get, at some point, some innovation in return.