3 ms·
The most interesting part is the (IMO usually poor!) reasoning by the judges, whether right or wrong. It's clear that most people have no idea what AI finds "di
by morelisp 4y ago
The most interesting part is the (IMO usually poor!) reasoning by the judges, whether right or wrong. It's clear that most people have no idea what AI finds "difficult", and try to generalize either from what's difficult for human artists, or what it's difficult to simulate with traditional digital techniques.
I would be interested in a comparison between image generators and artists with high technical skill but who focused their efforts into extremely kitsch/commercial work. I think the AI would see more "success" there.
- Avshalom 4y agoYeah, having watched twitter be flooded with this shit the only one that I even had to pause for was the landscape one. Though I suppose this could be some weird hoax article and next week they'll tell me it was all ai, even the text.
- morelisp 4y agoIMO: You can tell the left landscape is real because it has actually bold compositional choices with the near-horizontal river cutting across it; it confronts instead of merely "looking nice" (i.e. literally mediocre).