I think its interesting in the discussion of bullshit in the humanities article there is no knowledge or acknowledgement of published bullshit in STEM. And yet

I think its interesting in the discussion of bullshit in the humanities article there is no knowledge or acknowledgement of published bullshit in STEM. And yet pretty much every competent STEM academic is going to have seen a lot of it, perhaps more than in the humanities. There's a reason for citation counts and impact numbers being rewarded more than the raw number of publications when it's time for making tenure decisions.