> None of this means that the article is wrong, but it is definitely not unbiased. Who in their right mind would read this piece and think it unbiased? It is

> None of this means that the article is wrong, but it is definitely not unbiased. Who in their right mind would read this piece and think it unbiased? It is absolutely and unapologetically biased. This isn't journalism. It's closer to an op-ed, and is one person's account of their experiences. Did you really think you needed to put in the effort to engage in this ad hominem? That readers would be so ignorant as to see this piece as one of objective, factual journalism when it so clearly isn't?