4 ms·
This story of Intel and ARM is fascinating because it is likely to become one of the purest case studies of disruption theory. If ARM can successfully change th
by malay 15y ago
This story of Intel and ARM is fascinating because it is likely to become one of the purest case studies of disruption theory. If ARM can successfully change the basis of competition in the server market to power consumption versus pure performance and disrupt Intel, it will be another powerful example.
On the other hand, if Intel can actually capture share in the low end market (mobile devices) by hitting the right power-performance mark, they will provide a great example of how an incumbent can successfully fend off a low market entrant. Andy Grove would be proud.
If Intel manages to win in this next phase of computing, it will hopefully start to give companies pause before they outsource what some consultant deemed to be "non core" (manufacturing, in this example). Christensen has pointed out how much damage this is doing to long term results [1].
[1] http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/11/18/clayton-christensen-how-pursuit-of-profits-kills-innovation-and-the-us-economy/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/11/18/clayton-...
- lsc 15y agoeh, Intel, right now, could own the microserver/power sensitive server market. The Pentium 350 is a step in that direction, If they'd sell me pentium 350 chips, I could sell very fast, very cheap servers with ecc ram. But Intel won't sell them to me. Intel has a long history of nerfing their low-end products so that they compete less with their high end products. The question is will intel make a good low end chip (and not castrate it) before arm makes a reasonable server board? I mean, it's clear that Intel /can/ the question is if it /will/.