In this idealized argument it, like the real world, isn’t a zero sum game. If someone produces enough widgets where they can afford a jet ski then what’s the p

In this idealized argument it, like the real world, isn’t a zero sum game. If someone produces enough widgets where they can afford a jet ski then what’s the problem with that? Jet skis aren’t a product of nature, there’s probably a thousand people involved in the process of turning raw materials into a jet ski. Maybe more. People who are less poor because someone wanted to purchase a jet ski. And, because I know it’ll come up, charity also exists in this idealized argument so people aren’t dying of hunger while Scrooge McDuck does backflips into his pool of gold coins while saying “let them eat cake”.