3 ms·
> A vaccine we know doesn't prevent infection, transmission, sickness or death. The data doesn't support this. Of course you could say that the data has been t
by Nextgrid 4y ago
> A vaccine we know doesn't prevent infection, transmission, sickness or death.
The data doesn't support this. Of course you could say that the data has been tampered with, but so could be whatever data you use to "know" that the vaccine doesn't work.
The vaccine could work better for sure (and maybe future ones will), but beggars can't be choosers and even if it was only 10% effective it would be better than nothing.
> People who hate my children
This reeks of paranoid/conspiracist craziness. Nobody "hates" your children, and if they did, they'd have much easier, cheaper and more effective ways to poison and kill them than vaccines.
If a government wanted to kill people en-masse, why would they put the poison in something that arises concerns/suspicions such as vaccines or medicine instead of just putting it in the food supply chain or water supply which everyone consumes without a second thought?
- SangareEel 4y ago[flagged]
- Nextgrid 4y agoI’m not convinced because my point still stands - a vaccine sounds like the worst possible way to achieve ethnic cleansing, especially considering the same vaccine is distributed to everyone regardless of race. Why not put the poison in the water supply, or food, cigarettes or alcohol supply chains which nobody thinks twice about consuming?