> I think the lawsuits have a case if they can prove copyrighted images were taken and used directly in the commercial product. This is what I think would be t

> I think the lawsuits have a case if they can prove copyrighted images were taken and used directly in the commercial product. This is what I think would be the easiest thing to prove. Other people's work was used to create a product that is sold for a quite a bit of profit. No attribution, no compensation. To me it sounds like a pretty clear copyright violation, even if you don't consider what the product does. DeviantArt probably violated their own TOS. It'll be interesting to see how the courts view this.