4 ms·
These models produce a lot of “in the style of” content, which is different from an exact copy. Is that different enough? I guess that’s what this lawsuit is go
by limitedsupply 4y ago
These models produce a lot of “in the style of” content, which is different from an exact copy. Is that different enough? I guess that’s what this lawsuit is going to be about.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 4y agoI've seen some overtrained models. they keep showing the same face over and over again. surely from the training data. i don't think you can argue against stable diffusion as a whole, but maybe specific models that haven't muddled the data enough to become something unique
- visarga 4y agoIt's a small industry to fine-tune a model on your photos to generate fantasy images of yourself / to see yourself in a different way.
- TheMiddleMan 4y agoYeah what's considered a copy or not is a grey area. Here's a good example of that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34378300 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34378300 But artists have been making "in the style of" works for probably millennia. Fan art is a common example. I suppose the advent of software that makes it easy to make "in the style of" works will force us to get much more clear on what is and isn't a copy. How exciting. However, I don't see how the software tool is directly at fault, just the person using it.