3 ms·
What part specifically do you take issue with? Do you dispute that lower income communities have been deliberately allowed to be exposed to disproportionately h
by not_kurt_godel 4y ago
What part specifically do you take issue with? Do you dispute that lower income communities have been deliberately allowed to be exposed to disproportionately higher levels of air pollution?
- nemo44x 4y agoThey never once say “lower income” or “poor” or anything that has to do with economics. You are hallucinating what the language here wants you to.
- not_kurt_godel 4y agoIt's literally in the second sentence: > Fine particles, sometimes called soot, can penetrate deep into the lungs and can result in serious health effects that include asthma attacks, heart attacks and premature death – disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations including children, older adults, those with heart or lung conditions, as well as communities of color and low-income communities throughout the United States. Seems like you might be the one hallucinating a target for your misplaced ire.
- nemo44x 4y agoI missed the one sparse reference because they use every other work dog whistle over and over throughout. Why not just use that (shit things happen to poors) instead of all the other nonsense?
- not_kurt_godel 4y agoI honestly can't even guess what part of the rest of the article you're calling nonsense. Why don't you try improving your reading comprehension instead of throwing loony and completely inaccurate accusations at people doing their job to improve the lives of others?