5 ms·
This is an interesting point. The analysis was done on the 'index value' of the S&P 500 (from Yahoo Finance), not on any individual equities. I'm trying to disc
by tomsaffell 18y ago
This is an interesting point. The analysis was done on the 'index value' of the S&P 500 (from Yahoo Finance), not on any individual equities. I'm trying to discover how long a 'long term investment' need be, if one invests in an S&P 500 index / ETF / iShare. (I'm no expert on the subtleties of those investment vehicles). My understanding is that they track (as best they can) the value of the index by investing in the stocks that compose the index. Therefore I guess that when company in the S&P 500 goes bust the effect that has on one's investment closely matches the effect it has on index value. I'll research that. Assuming this is true, I think we needn’t be concerned by the bankruptcy issue that you make. But please correct me if I'm wrong about that - I'm interested.
I'll try to add TSR in the next analysis too.
- mattmaroon 18y agoIt's not interesting, it's just wrong. Even if the total market averages 10%, that's counting bankruptcies. It's not a median or a mode, it's a mean.
- mixmax 18y agoMatt, you're right. I thought he was looking at a portfolio of individual stock, not an index where bankruptcies are supposedly included. My bad...
- mixmax 18y agoahh, yes you're tracking S & P 500. Sorry, I probably read the aricle a little quickly... I don't know for sure, but I would think you're right in your assertion that the index incorporates the risk of companies failing.