4 ms·
For believing a preliminary correlation that is explicitly stated as unlikely to have a causal link? Did you read the article before commenting?
by devmor 4y ago
For believing a preliminary correlation that is explicitly stated as unlikely to have a causal link?
Did you read the article before commenting?
- lern_too_spel 4y ago[flagged]
- sn0w_crash 4y agoGP is an antivaxxer? How could you conclude that from 1 line of text?
- lern_too_spel 4y agoGGGP, not GGP. It's strongly suggested by that one line of text and confirmed by other lines of text in their history. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34334751 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34334751
- fear_and_coffee 4y agoAnything that dared go beyond "vaccines are safe and effective" was conspiracy theory.