3 ms·
Way to show you didn't read the article. Her employer did not sue her. Her employer fired her for underperforming and falsifying her time sheets. She sued he
by olliej 4y ago
Way to show you didn't read the article.
Her employer did not sue her.
Her employer fired her for underperforming and falsifying her time sheets.
She sued her employer saying that that was not a valid cause.
The court said that it clearly was and that she now had to pay back some of the costs.
She would have gotten away with falsifying her timesheets if she hadn't decided to sue them.
Also: The monitoring software was not installed until after she had been underperforming and presumably had suspicious billing, and it was installed with her permission.
- sixothree 4y agoHonestly, you demonstrated poor reading comprehension here. >Her employer did not sue her. Did I suggest otherwise? >Her employer fired her for underperforming and falsifying her time sheets. Did I suggest otherwise? >She sued her employer saying that that was not a valid cause. Did I suggest otherwise? >The court said that it clearly was and that she now had to pay back some of the costs. Did I suggest otherwise? >She would have gotten away with falsifying her timesheets if she hadn't decided to sue them. Did I suggest otherwise?