3 ms·
The order is rarely against intoxication but rather consumption. Consuming a glass of wine and not getting intoxicated would violate many of these orders.
by notch656c 4y ago
The order is rarely against intoxication but rather consumption. Consuming a glass of wine and not getting intoxicated would violate many of these orders.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- tedunangst 4y agoAre those restrictions common in cases that don't allegedly involve intoxication? For the most part, the federal restrictions I've seen usually have a purported connection to the criminal activity.
- edgyquant 4y agoThis is pedanticism. When people don’t drink wine they never get drunk. Period.
- notch656c 4y agoThat's a lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-brewery_syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-brewery_syndrome
- RC_ITR 4y agoHow can alcohol consumption not lead to intoxication? Society has decided that for most people, low-level intoxication is no big deal, but I’d argue it is for people accused of crimes. Even one beer could make fleeing just appealing enough.