3 ms·
Seems to be matching against one particular typeface, and is very sensitive to how similar what you write is to that typeface. The first thing I tried was a low
by apendleton 4y ago
Seems to be matching against one particular typeface, and is very sensitive to how similar what you write is to that typeface. The first thing I tried was a lowercase "a," which, in my handwriting, is a one-story "a," and it had no idea what it was. Likewise it guessed poorly at my lowercase "f" because the top of my "f" curves back down, and its doesn't, etc. Seems like it would benefit from a dataset with more variations on how various characters are written in practice.
Neat concept though!
- Symbiote 4y agoIt's now useful for arrows, mathematics etc.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- croon 4y agoI tried multiple times to match an ampersand, and thought I did a fairly accurate job. I eventually managed to get it as a third match, but this seems to be what it matches against [0], which isn't the ampersand I'm used to (nor the one you get in a google image search). [0] https://shapecatcher.com/unicode_img/38.png https://shapecatcher.com/unicode_img/38.png