3 ms·
Yes, corporation persons desperately want people to move to http/2 and http/3 for for-profit reasons. They're terrible protocols for human persons though. Phasi
by superkuh 4y ago
Yes, corporation persons desperately want people to move to http/2 and http/3 for for-profit reasons. They're terrible protocols for human persons though. Phasing out http/1.1 support in chrome/etc means phasing out the ability to host a website that can be visited by someone you don't know without the continued permission from a third party TLS CA.
- kccqzy 4y agoThis guy is already using TLS. The site has already obtained a certificate from a CA. How does http/1.1 or http/2 have anything to do with it?
- superkuh 4y agoHTTP/2 and HTTP/3 implementations do not allow you to connect to an IP/domain unless there is CA based TLS. HTTP/1.1 allows both HTTP and HTTPS to coexist. If for some reason the CA based TLS cert is revoked I can always just visit the http site over HTTP/1.1.