4 ms·
The problem with this kind of ad-hoc TODO lists is integration. They are alright as long as you don't try anything fancy but this is inevitably going to happen
by pmr_ 15y ago
The problem with this kind of ad-hoc TODO lists is integration. They are alright as long as you don't try anything fancy but this is inevitably going to happen as soon as something gathers more users. And suddenly you hit a wall in terms of integration and extensibility in most environments. How do I tie in a simple link? Oh, we need links to eMails/files as well. Someone needs more than one kind of TODO. Hierarchical TODOs would be nice. TODO dependencies. Exporters. The list of possible features is endless and every system that does not keep that in mind and plans for it is doomed to fail or only usable for a very small user base, which is fine if that's your goal.
- jfresh13 15y agoThis is for personal productivity, not product management.
- pmr_ 15y agoIf that is all you require, it is perfectly alright. All the features I mentioned are not part of some product managment software but of the usual personal productivity suites.
- mcantelon 15y agoSounds like something like Redmine would be needed in that case.
- pmr_ 15y agoI should have mentioned that I'm an org-mode user and that this is only a subset of the features I expect my time management system to do.