> I don't know it strikes me as reactionary. Why is that a problem? At this point in the game most things that need to be done to address climate change and po

> I don't know it strikes me as reactionary. Why is that a problem? At this point in the game most things that need to be done to address climate change and pollution are reactionary. > If this comes down to CO2 there are bigger fish to fry, no? You can say that about almost anything. There's always "bigger fish to fry", but that doesn't mean we should only ever deal with the "biggest fish". We regulate car emissions even though ships and airplanes are arguably the "bigger fish". We prosecute thefts even though most people would consider prosecuting murders the "bigger fish".