5 ms·

Curious what others would pay/if anyone else signed the form? I'd pay like $10/mo I think. Possibly more if there were no censorship/limitations (it had access

Curious what others would pay/if anyone else signed the form? I'd pay like $10/mo I think. Possibly more if there were no censorship/limitations (it had access to internet browsing, and I could direct it to URL's for information and whatnot). I pay that for Copilot right now, which I feel is easily worth $50/mo. (I don't use ChatGPT that much, it'd need to be ingrained in my IDE workflow)

pjot 4y ago
High bar: $50 Low bar: $5 Would consider: $25 Bargain: $10
- layer8 4y ago
  You wouldn’t subscribe for $4?
  - pjot 4y ago
    Definitely! The survey’s question though asked when might a price too low affect quality.
joshstrange 4y ago
Yeah, I'd need to find a way to integrate ChatGPT more into my life, right now it's just a fun toy I occasionally try. Now if it had an API and people could build apps/plugins with it (and I just login with my ChatGPT account) then I'd be interested. CoPilot has provided me amazing value for the a tiny price. It's to the point that for anything even resembling boilerplate/obvious code I just expect it will get it right (the exact way I would have written it). The other day I was using CodeRunner (a little tool to run/test snippets of code in various languages, it's not perfect but it's a nice little playground that runs locally) and I was just staring at the screen wondering why it wasn't auto-completing the line before I realized "Oh, I don't have CoPilot here", I've come to depend/expect it's output, to "trust" it such that when it's not there I feel the loss. Same way I wish I had multiple cursors in every app/webapp like I do in my IDE.
idopmstuff 4y ago
I put $10-20, but I'd honestly probably go a little higher than that. That's less a function of ChatGPT's utility (it's great for some things but not enough to be a huge timesaver) and more of the fact that I think it's neat. Given my finances, something like $25/month isn't going to have any noticeable impact, so that seems like a reasonable price to pay for a fun toy that reminds me that we're living in the future.
scrollaway 4y ago
Assuming it doesn't have the limitations it has right now, and it becomes more reliable, I put in $4 for too low, $400 for too high, $250 for would consider, $50 for bargain. You have to know how to use it, but if you do, then it easily is far less expensive than the alternative. However, at $400+/mo, it starts to be worth it to just use gpt directly and write your own chatbot.
weird-eye-issue 4y ago
$200
- weird-eye-issue 4y ago
  Guys, I'm in the content business. If you know what you are doing you can get thousands of dollars of value out of it.
theshrike79 4y ago
I'd pay $10 in a heartbeat if that would lift some of the limitations and issues caused by high load. Basically separate the free tier riffraff from blue checkmark people. I might pay up to $20 if I had access to a proper API to integrate ChatGPT with my life better.
hanoz 4y ago
I think I'd pay $10/mo for it but then I'd probably cancel my Copilot subscription because its integration with Visual Studio is so poor.

pjot 4y ago

High bar: $50 Low bar: $5 Would consider: $25 Bargain: $10

layer8 4y ago
You wouldn’t subscribe for $4?
- pjot 4y ago
  Definitely! The survey’s question though asked when might a price too low affect quality.

joshstrange 4y ago

Yeah, I'd need to find a way to integrate ChatGPT more into my life, right now it's just a fun toy I occasionally try. Now if it had an API and people could build apps/plugins with it (and I just login with my ChatGPT account) then I'd be interested. CoPilot has provided me amazing value for the a tiny price. It's to the point that for anything even resembling boilerplate/obvious code I just expect it will get it right (the exact way I would have written it). The other day I was using CodeRunner (a little tool to run/test snippets of code in various languages, it's not perfect but it's a nice little playground that runs locally) and I was just staring at the screen wondering why it wasn't auto-completing the line before I realized "Oh, I don't have CoPilot here", I've come to depend/expect it's output, to "trust" it such that when it's not there I feel the loss. Same way I wish I had multiple cursors in every app/webapp like I do in my IDE.

idopmstuff 4y ago

I put $10-20, but I'd honestly probably go a little higher than that. That's less a function of ChatGPT's utility (it's great for some things but not enough to be a huge timesaver) and more of the fact that I think it's neat. Given my finances, something like $25/month isn't going to have any noticeable impact, so that seems like a reasonable price to pay for a fun toy that reminds me that we're living in the future.

scrollaway 4y ago

Assuming it doesn't have the limitations it has right now, and it becomes more reliable, I put in $4 for too low, $400 for too high, $250 for would consider, $50 for bargain. You have to know how to use it, but if you do, then it easily is far less expensive than the alternative. However, at $400+/mo, it starts to be worth it to just use gpt directly and write your own chatbot.

weird-eye-issue 4y ago

$200

weird-eye-issue 4y ago
Guys, I'm in the content business. If you know what you are doing you can get thousands of dollars of value out of it.

theshrike79 4y ago

I'd pay $10 in a heartbeat if that would lift some of the limitations and issues caused by high load. Basically separate the free tier riffraff from blue checkmark people. I might pay up to $20 if I had access to a proper API to integrate ChatGPT with my life better.

hanoz 4y ago

I think I'd pay $10/mo for it but then I'd probably cancel my Copilot subscription because its integration with Visual Studio is so poor.