2 ms·
This one alone is worth it for the graph. The other one doesn't have the graph. (I spent most of my time oogling at the graph.)
by gwbas1c 4y ago
This one alone is worth it for the graph. The other one doesn't have the graph.
(I spent most of my time oogling at the graph.)
- SamBam 4y agoI actually find the graph confusing because they don't label what the other gray and dashed lines are. Are they just multiple estimates that Exxon made, and dashed lines are simply another shade of gray?
- gwbas1c 4y agoIt made a lot more sense skimming the article. Exxon's estimates were +-.
- thimkerbell 4y agoThat's an interesting example of what could be a social media dark pattern, to initially link to a less informative (since no graph) article on the [timely thing], and dismiss a later post linking to more informative (with striking graph) coverage, as a duplicate. Or maybe we are being 'led down the garden path' here, since the graph varies subtly from Supran's.