4 ms·
Instead of asking, is this true or not, it is often better to ask "What is this true of?" Hyaline seas are a great thing in literature, and a terrible idea in a
by red_admiral 4y ago
Instead of asking, is this true or not, it is often better to ask "What is this true of?" Hyaline seas are a great thing in literature, and a terrible idea in a public service leaflet about what to do if you hear the tsunami warning sirens.
I have read lots of student projects and dissertations where, although the student could explain themselves perfectly fine in spoken English, once they were in front of a keyboard and TeXworks they fell into a style of writing that was as tortured as the syntax for fancy LaTeX tables. Orwell's advice would have been very good advice for these students!
As to writing specifically for small children: J.R.R. Tolkien's childrens' story Roverandom contains a character called Psamathos Psammethicus, and Tolkien made quite clear in other writing of his that he doesn't think much of "writing down" even to children. A. A. Milne similarly has a scene in which Owl says "The atmospheric conditions have been very unfavourable lately." "The what?", Pooh asks. "It has been raining.", Owl explains. That's all at once an example of making fun of pretentious writing, giving an example of the kind of writer who should read some Orwell, and something that even very young children can handle just fine (along with words like Heffalump).
- 082349872349872 4y ago> The capacity to qualify a predicative phrase by the interpolation of a subordinate clause (for example) is one of those precious attainments that distinguish us from baboons. may well be pretentious*, but it is also true. * if only due to the self reference; I doubt the embedding should give any serious reader pause? [Edit: sic et non, for even baboons can follow this embedding pattern: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-64244-5 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-64244-5 ]