4 ms·
I think the objections to things like this is the tech for tech sake. Like with backup cameras that we just don't want to pay for. I've been driving for 20+ y
by john_the_writer 4y ago
I think the objections to things like this is the tech for tech sake.
Like with backup cameras that we just don't want to pay for. I've been driving for 20+ years and never once bumped my car. So the safety aspect isn't really relevant. But when I get told "We added this backup camera for free, so you're saving 500$". Honestly I'd rather have you shave 500$ off the price of the car.
I've actually had that conversation about bluetooth in my current car. 8 years old and I've never used the bluetooth. It was tech for tech sake. It adds no value.
- CorrectHorseBat 4y agoBack up cameras are not there to stop you from bumping into things but stopping you from running over a kid