2 ms·
If the species was a human, it would by now be institutionalized for self-harm while delusional, but well, there is no warden to put us into a zoo and govern af
by qikInNdOutReply 4y ago
If the species was a human, it would by now be institutionalized for self-harm while delusional, but well, there is no warden to put us into a zoo and govern affairs, so there is that.
Instead we basically have a species, that is the equivalent of a homeless drug addict on the tenderloin, soiling its own future.
A good start would be to honestly communicate this as the starting point of every debate. Then evaluate what can be done, without retardations setting in, in the range of the limitations.
How much of the day can be used, without withdrawl syndroms.
How can delusions be crafted into something that moves the species forward towards a reasonable goal?
What has to go, even if it hurts temporary and the "other hand" wants to prevent it?
As in, is it okay, to call for a first strike policy on someone who wants to assasinate you in 3 generations? Can terrarism against terrorism be legit as self-defense?
https://www.amazon.de/How-Blow-Up-Pipeline-Learning/dp/1839760257 https://www.amazon.de/How-Blow-Up-Pipeline-Learning/dp/18397...
- boeingUH60 4y agoAre you advocating blowing up a pipeline? Won’t even get into the morality of that, but that’s a nice way to get yourself killed or spend decades in prison for terrorism.
- chmod775 4y agoWould they be a hero or a villain? If the action would make them a hero, are there reasons they shouldn't do it anyway? Common reply to the latter is that people may be misguided in what constitutes a heroic selfless action and shouldn't take matters into their own hands. This philosophical debate is as old as time itself.
- selfhoster11 4y agoI don't advocate violence, but realistically a peaceful resolution will take time. We don't have time.