3 ms·
We looked into the data in 2015 and wrote this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07723 https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07723 From the abstract: A common objection
by heinrichhartman 4y ago
We looked into the data in 2015 and wrote this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07723 https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07723
From the abstract:
A common objection against the use of these platforms is the delegation system, where a user can delegate his vote to another user, giving rise to so-called super-voters, i.e. powerful users who receive many delegations. It has been asserted in the past that the presence of these super-voters undermines the democratic process, and therefore delegative democracy should be avoided. In this paper, we look at the emergence of super-voters in the largest delegative online democracy platform worldwide, operated by Germany's Pirate Party. We investigate the distribution of power within the party systematically, study whether super-voters exist, and explore the influence they have on the outcome of votings conducted online. While we find that the theoretical power of super-voters is indeed high, we also observe that they use their power wisely.
The Related Work section may also be of interest for you.
- tgsovlerkhgsel 4y agoAre you aware of any research specifically into the risk of demotivating people who expect the ability to participate directly, but are then facing a situation where e.g. a single superdelegate can nix an initiative (this is a possibility I saw mentioned in the Jabbusch analysis)? I'd be interested to know how much of that is just my own perception vs. what the actual data says.