3 ms·

I have kind of done that for last few months. Chat GPT helped immensely with that. I recently even asked if it's worth it to go back to academia. Still explorin

I have kind of done that for last few months. Chat GPT helped immensely with that. I recently even asked if it's worth it to go back to academia. Still exploring that. A few things that I recently understood or read about. - Fermi Paradox - with help of chatgpt https://imgur.com/a/LuVV6iK https://imgur.com/a/LuVV6iK - How the age of universe was calculated. - Redshift - How age of solar system was calculated. I previously thought just like the universe is expanding, so is solar system. Turns out that is not the case. The distances have been more or less fixed. (i thought sun would be losing some mass, weakening gravitation for that to happen, nothing like that). - Exo-planets. - a lot of nuclear physics. - Parallel universe theory according to quantum mechanics. - gravitational waves (how to measure ripples in spacetime https://www.wired.co.uk/article/catching-cosmic-rays-virgo-interferometer https://www.wired.co.uk/article/catching-cosmic-rays-virgo-i...) - Theories around nuclear fusion and how ML, High Temp super conductivity and more precise chips are making advances possible. And so on. Will add one special mention to this: https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-this-universe-new-calculation-suggests-our-cosmos-is-typical-20221117/ https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-this-universe-new-calcula... (this universe exists because it has the highest entropy is a layman summary of the article)

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
go_elmo 4y ago
Chances are significant that some explanations received are just not true as chatgpt does that too, unfortunately.
- ankit219 4y ago
  Not all of it is from chatgpt. It's a good starting point, and essentially tells me what to google and how to read further. When I get something, I anyway want to read more so would google around the topic. The ability to ask a cross question is what makes learning easier. If the answer is not true, i will end up finding that out anyway from google or other science publications.
kettleballroll 4y ago
Interesting approach. Aren't you worried that chatgpt is feeding you bullshit without you noticing? I'd imagine chatgpt read as much science fiction content as science one, so there's no way to know if it tells the truth or hallucinations. How do you deal with that?
- ankit219 4y ago
  It's a good starting point. It may get some things wrong, but that's where my ability to research and truth seeking lies. I usually google more anyway because i want to go deeper than what chatgpt offers. I will eventually get to the truth. But the basic questions are well answered. I once asked it to explain the whole "Field has momentum" theory in a way a Feynman lecture would. It did it surprisingly well. I had some background so I kept asking more questions, and it was alright. Augments the curiosity, and make the topic seem simpler. Tools I use are: Google, science publications, and archive to see if there is text around it. One small thing, the idea that chatgpt will feed bullshit is possible, so you have to be a bit skeptic and check the info, but it gets things right most of the times. Fun fact: I confused chatgpt about static electricity ie "Why does my hair get a static charge by rubbing a balloon?" It kept saying positive charge or negative charge, with transfer of electrons. Truth is, it's still poorly understood. [1] this paper highlights the conundrum. For a beginner in college level physics, chatgpt is an excellent resource for understanding concepts. [1]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360674587_Derivation_of_a_governing_rule_in_triboelectric_charging_and_series_from_thermoelectricity https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360674587_Derivatio...
smcnally 4y ago
Anton Petrov regularly covers topics like these and encourages sharing with people interested in space and sciences. https://youtube.com/@whatdamath https://youtube.com/@whatdamath
- ankit219 4y ago
  Love it. Bookmarked. Thanks for sharing.
lnkl 4y ago
Seems like https://www.edx.org/xseries/astrophysics?index=product&queryID=876ba61a8ab63f580786638235df3500&position=1 https://www.edx.org/xseries/astrophysics?index=product&query... would be of interest to you.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

go_elmo 4y ago

Chances are significant that some explanations received are just not true as chatgpt does that too, unfortunately.

ankit219 4y ago
Not all of it is from chatgpt. It's a good starting point, and essentially tells me what to google and how to read further. When I get something, I anyway want to read more so would google around the topic. The ability to ask a cross question is what makes learning easier. If the answer is not true, i will end up finding that out anyway from google or other science publications.

kettleballroll 4y ago

Interesting approach. Aren't you worried that chatgpt is feeding you bullshit without you noticing? I'd imagine chatgpt read as much science fiction content as science one, so there's no way to know if it tells the truth or hallucinations. How do you deal with that?

ankit219 4y ago
It's a good starting point. It may get some things wrong, but that's where my ability to research and truth seeking lies. I usually google more anyway because i want to go deeper than what chatgpt offers. I will eventually get to the truth. But the basic questions are well answered. I once asked it to explain the whole "Field has momentum" theory in a way a Feynman lecture would. It did it surprisingly well. I had some background so I kept asking more questions, and it was alright. Augments the curiosity, and make the topic seem simpler. Tools I use are: Google, science publications, and archive to see if there is text around it. One small thing, the idea that chatgpt will feed bullshit is possible, so you have to be a bit skeptic and check the info, but it gets things right most of the times. Fun fact: I confused chatgpt about static electricity ie "Why does my hair get a static charge by rubbing a balloon?" It kept saying positive charge or negative charge, with transfer of electrons. Truth is, it's still poorly understood. [1] this paper highlights the conundrum. For a beginner in college level physics, chatgpt is an excellent resource for understanding concepts. [1]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360674587_Derivation_of_a_governing_rule_in_triboelectric_charging_and_series_from_thermoelectricity https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360674587_Derivatio...

smcnally 4y ago

Anton Petrov regularly covers topics like these and encourages sharing with people interested in space and sciences. https://youtube.com/@whatdamath https://youtube.com/@whatdamath

ankit219 4y ago
Love it. Bookmarked. Thanks for sharing.

lnkl 4y ago

Seems like https://www.edx.org/xseries/astrophysics?index=product&queryID=876ba61a8ab63f580786638235df3500&position=1 https://www.edx.org/xseries/astrophysics?index=product&query... would be of interest to you.