9 ms·
I think the OP was talking about the bacteria that derive non-negligible sustenance from viruses. >Moreover, our foraging trials demonstrated robust growth in
by whatshisface 4y ago
I think the OP was talking about the bacteria that derive non-negligible sustenance from viruses.
>Moreover, our foraging trials demonstrated robust growth in the Halteria population with only chloroviruses as food (rint = 0.66 ± 0.26 [SD], black lines, Fig. 1A), with minimal to no growth in the controls (with chloroviruses filtered out; rint = 0.22 ± 0.12 [SD], blue lines, Fig. 1C). The abundance of the larger Paramecium did not increase in treatment or control trials (Fig. 1D), indicating that not all ciliates can grow on chloroviruses in these conditions, even when they consume them.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2215000120 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2215000120
- eru 4y agoYes, I know. That's why I wrote >> Up until last year nobody had thought to see whether anything eats viruses! Turns out some do. > Nah, lots of things eat viruses. It's nothing unusual at all. You eat viruses, I eat viruses. They are everywhere, after all. > The novel finding was a critter that lives / can live solely on viruses.
- moloch-hai 4y agoYou wrote it, but it was what we all understood already, making writing it nothing but an exercise in snark.
- eru 4y agoNot sure. Eg creatures that eat plastic are still news, even if plastic is not their sole diet.
- moloch-hai 4y agoYet, you are eating plastic every day.
- eru 4y agoYes, but not digesting it.