4 ms·
> The proof of human problems is actually addressable I think it's fundamentally impossible and I have yet to see something that make me envision the possibili
by Rexxar 4y ago
> The proof of human problems is actually addressable
I think it's fundamentally impossible and I have yet to see something that make me envision the possibility it could be possible.
The most important part of democratic vote is not the ballot box but the voting booth : the place where you have the guaranty that every citizen go only once per vote, is alone and can decide by himself without any external pressure what to put in the ballot box.
Every electronic or remote systems is subject in a way or an other to the risk of vote buying or threat to force people to vote against their will.
- JanisErdmanis 4y agoThe top thread emphasises the problem of digital identity. It's the question of how we can be sure that the digital credentials with which voters participate have been allocated fairly, like having fake passports printed, impersonating dead people or voting in place of those who often don't come to vote. > I have yet to see something that make me envision the possibility it could be possible. Remote electronic voting is a very hard problem to crack. The systems that could have some merit have fallen out from academic endeavours. I recommend looking at this paper could help to envision the possibility: > Rolf Haenni, Oliver Spycher, Secure Internet Voting on Limited Devices with Anonymized DSA Public Keys, 2011.