3 ms·
That's your take away? I think the point is that all the people in the world and all the various information they have received leads them to believe that a la
by upsidesinclude 4y ago
That's your take away?
I think the point is that all the people in the world and all the various information they have received leads them to believe that a laboratory studying this very virus was responsible for its release.
You chose to side with those that would blind themselves to any information that doesn't conform to a narrative
- mianos 4y agoNot at all. The article is saying, with a 'shortfall' of evidence, he thinks we should consider both possible sources, man made and from the wild. That is perfectly reasonable to me. We don't have enough information and it's pretty bad a lot of professional public spokespeople are saying we are sure. That's the narrative. But, why does public opinion even factor in this argument? Like many people here I have closely followed a lot of the information published. I certainly feel I am much more informed about this than my friends. But, my opinion on the source does not count for shit if professional scientists say they don't know. This guy is a professional.
- netsharc 4y agoThe author is presumably a lady (her name is Alina) and the top of the article also says "Opinion". But my comment also questions why she thinks it matters what the public believes.