Interesting comment, and really share the feeling. I’m curious to hear from others who read your words and went “oh yeah I definitely experienced something like

Interesting comment, and really share the feeling. I’m curious to hear from others who read your words and went “oh yeah I definitely experienced something like that before.” Personally I think this is hard to achieve. It would imply requirements never change. It would mean that the what and why behind a product are set in stone for months/years to come, including lower level functional details. It implies the market doesn’t move. And on another note, that you’re not part of discussions around technical feasibility, tech debt, and so on, that could change the trajectory of a project and its issues. I don’t see an endless refined backlog happen, but I’d like to be wrong. Maybe this happens in something like airplane software engineering?