3 ms·
> I imagine getting into the meat of the paper would quickly reveal issues This is a tautology: the thing that can be validated can be validated.
by lelandfe 4y ago
> I imagine getting into the meat of the paper would quickly reveal issues
This is a tautology: the thing that can be validated can be validated.
- SketchySeaBeast 4y agoI think it has an important difference for ChatGPT - it likes to generate numbers that make absolutely no sense. A human that lies will try to generate sufficiently correct data to convince. ChatGPT often won't even make an attempt to produce values that fit.
- daveguy 4y agoI guess that's good for us meat beings. Better for an AI to incompetently lie than competently lie. I wonder if having AI models available would make it significantly easier to identify material created by that model. Seems it would be easier, but it would still be a big problem. Nets can be trained to identify ai vs not ai on a given model. And that's without needing access to the model weights, just training examples. But when there are N potential models... Edit: Second paragraph added later.
- neaden 4y agoChatGPT right now also likes to make up fake citations when you ask it how it knows something, which could be checked quickly.
- InCityDreams 4y ago...request an example [I've tried, avail is none].