I'm not buying it. Monarchy was the best system ever tried until democracy gained prominence. Voting with feet and voting with dollars has always been a way to

I'm not buying it. Monarchy was the best system ever tried until democracy gained prominence. Voting with feet and voting with dollars has always been a way to make workers and consumers(often the same) feel like they've got a say without actually giving them one. The problem is that the territory of the conflict is attempting to be constrained ie: within the current legal structure. What isn't allowed here is the conflict to spill into the province of arguing about the rules of the game itself. We've never had a static legal landscape and never will, and yet arguments like these assume it. Workers should have a shot at workplace democracy because it's a fundamental right of self-determination. Carve-outs of that right like in workplaces are only as natural as we make them.