2 ms·
HPV is well defined. ;) As for HPF, it seems to be a euphemism for hyper-palatable food, i.e. food that increases time and calories consumed before meal cessat
by hombre_fatal 4y ago
HPV is well defined. ;)
As for HPF, it seems to be a euphemism for hyper-palatable food, i.e. food that increases time and calories consumed before meal cessation. There's probably a threshold that captures 99% of the foods we are talking about while excluding 99% of the foods that are highly processed but not hyper-palatable.
For example, unsweetened dark chocolate (70%+ cacao) would certainly be highly processed but not something highly palatable to most people. Same with Grape Nuts cereal or bran buds. Unsalted saltine crackers also come to mind.
Palatability + calorie density seem like the best distinctions to focus on for this reason as processing is often used to increase palatability/density but not only used to increase them.
- rendaw 4y agoHighly palatable == makes you want to eat more? That sounds like circular reasoning: of course foods that make you want to eat more make you want to eat more.
- hombre_fatal 4y agoRephrasing or defining something doesn't make it circular because it's not an entailment. If B can be used to define term A, then B isn't a logical conclusion of something being A, it's just synonymous. e.g. "Make you want to eat more" is still the operative difference here between a bag of potato chips and a bowl of lentils.