4 ms·
? Companies are held criminally liable for stuff sometimes, but what above posters seem to want is for the CEO to be held personally liable.
by ss108 4y ago
? Companies are held criminally liable for stuff sometimes, but what above posters seem to want is for the CEO to be held personally liable.
- eh9 4y agoWell, he did personally misuse the platform, but go for the company. Idk. I’m not a lawyer and I don’t know how 230 plays into this, but his actions could have led to an innocent person getting hurt.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ss108 4y agoMy b, I didn't realize he did it in his personal capacity.
- Jochim 4y agoThe CEO was the person who personally posted a $30,000 bounty encouraging vigilantes to apprehend an innocent person. The company he was "leading" broadcast that person's photo and name. He should be held personally liable in addition to the company being held liable.