3 ms·
> Done correctly, this is great for employees, their morale, and their productivity. IMO, the "correct" way to do it is to establish a minimum amount of time o
by Sohcahtoa82 4y ago
> Done correctly, this is great for employees, their morale, and their productivity.
IMO, the "correct" way to do it is to establish a minimum amount of time off.
I think it's reasonable to require people take at least 15 days of PTO, with at least 5 of them taken as a consecutive week.
I also wonder if releasing statistics on how much PTO people took would help?
- jxidjhdhdhdhfhf 4y agoHaving accrued PTO essentially solves this problem. Either you take your assigned leave or if the business requires you to skip your vacation they can either give you an extra payout for it or they can let you roll PTO over into next year. In practice this mostly results in employees using all of their leave in a given year.
- Sohcahtoa82 4y agoIt's a mind game, really. If you give people 4 weeks PTO, they'll take 4 weeks. If you give 6 weeks, they'll take 6 weeks. If you give "unlimited", then they'll take 3 weeks because they're afraid of looking like they're abusing the benefit.