3 ms·
Ironically I was just about to drop in absurd-sql [1] to a project, which uses indexeddb to back SQLite. This seems better. [1] https://github.com/jlongster/ab
by gfodor 4y ago
Ironically I was just about to drop in absurd-sql [1] to a project, which uses indexeddb to back SQLite. This seems better.
[1] https://github.com/jlongster/absurd-sql https://github.com/jlongster/absurd-sql
- DylanSp 4y agoThis is definitely better, yeah. The blog post[1] on absurd-sql notes that it's a hacky solution that would be improved with file system access; it references the old Storage Foundation proposal [2], which has since evolved into the current File System Access API proposal(s). [1] https://jlongster.com/future-sql-web https://jlongster.com/future-sql-web [2] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/storage-foundation/ https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/storage-found...
- Dork1234 4y agoWill either SQLite WASM or absurd-sql work on Firefox and Safari?
- tantaman 4y agoIf it helps, I detail some of the pros/cons of using the official SQLite build vs unofficial builds (wa-sqlite, which is similar to absured-sql) here: https://vlcn.io/docs/guide-persistence#persistence-options https://vlcn.io/docs/guide-persistence#persistence-options