4 ms·
> Every one of those is an abstract component. Making up an abstract system. There are no algorithms, no methods, no inventions. It's a collection of abstract i
by anamax 15y ago
> Every one of those is an abstract component. Making up an abstract system. There are no algorithms, no methods, no inventions. It's a collection of abstract ideas.
It's unclear why you think that "abstract" ideas shouldn't be patentable or aren't useful knowledge.
Suppose you were the first person to conceive of a wheel, which is surely something where disclosure would be of great value to the rest of us.
What would be acceptable-to-you claim language for a wheel?
Mine would be something along the lines of a description of the distance between the closest point on the axle and some point on the contour of the wheel, which is pretty abstract.
- nahname 15y agoThat is actually quite specific. Try thinking of patenting the ability to move objects via reducing the coefficient of friction. Not even specifying that you are using a wheel or what a wheel is.
- jfoutz 15y agofor a long time, the patent office required little models of the thing to be patented. it was a huge pain in the ass, but seems like a worthwhile requirement.