4 ms·
Sydney here. I feel the exact same way. The first I heard of this was on reddit. I'm thinking of building a website dedicated to making this issue heard. I have
by woodsier 18y ago
Sydney here. I feel the exact same way. The first I heard of this was on reddit. I'm thinking of building a website dedicated to making this issue heard. I have a fairly influential scope that could generate TV/print media regarding the issue, what do you guys think?
This whole thing is hugely sneaky. Clearly the proposed plan was initiated as an opt-out, however after heads began nodding it was changed to mandatory. And now the thing doesn't even bloody work, while fucking up the internet.
On top of all this, I don't think this Conroy chap actually understands the internet. He doesn't understand the scope, the open nature, and how it constantly changes in a way that is impossible to regulate. Hell, Google is only what it is because it was the first company that was able to create any sense of order out of the internet.
Most illegal stuff is transferred via bittorrent. This will do nothing.
The worst child pornography abusers will find their fix elsewhere, to the extent of creating new and secret websites to share their shit. Does he honestly think putting in this kind of regime will make these guys step back from their computers and say, "Well, fuck it, I guess I can't look at a 6-year-old flat chest anymore. Time to move on!" All this bloody thing will do is create more clandestine measures of subverting authorities.
This whole thing is like the war in Iraq, and why the US has failed. There is no enemy. There is no "Terrorist Central" that they can nuke, wash their hands of and say, "Well, that was a jolly good shot! They are all gone, problem solved". When one insurgent falls, more stand up to take their place. And in the meantime, thousands of innocents are adversely affected by the whole shit storm created by the situation. This is like DRM. It does nothing to stem the problem, and it fucks shit up for everyone.
The only people who stand to gain anything from this, assuming the media believes the babble and society is not informed of the ineffectiveness of this plan, is Conroy.
- alexkay 18y ago> I'm thinking of building a website dedicated to making this issue heard. Such a website already exists: http://www.netalarmed.com/ http://www.netalarmed.com/
- someperson 18y agoand http://www.nocleanfeed.com http://www.nocleanfeed.com
- woodsier 18y agoThat's alright, but not quite what I meant. I mean a resource you can give to the media that isn't a satire. Maybe a one-page website that, in essay form, outlines the issue in full.
- fallentimes 18y agoPlease do this.
- woodsier 18y agoAlright. Keep your eyes open near the end of the week for the completed work.
- netcan 18y agoPlease try to keep the technical arguments against seperate from the fundamental. The open nature of the internet, the cost of infringing on free speech, the dangers of putting in place mechanisms of censorship (to me this is no. 1) etc. are unrelated to the technical issues: Bittorent will still be available, there will be false positives, this will affect download speeds, etc. Both are valid forms of criticism. But keep the seperate.