3 ms·
My overall point is that trains will not replace cars in the United States any time soon, so they would not be a very good replacement for autonomous driving la
by shepherdjerred 4y ago
My overall point is that trains will not replace cars in the United States any time soon, so they would not be a very good replacement for autonomous driving lanes.
> Planes aren't either, what's your point?
My point is that the comment I replied to implied that trains can replace cars. Trains cannot replace cars because they are a form of public transportation, which cannot easily replace cars.
> That people who need to go somewhere should be priced out
This is quite the leap. My comment did not argue the merits of either, merely that trains would not be a very good replacement for autonomous vehicle lanes.
> have you ever even been outside of suburbia?
This isn't useful to your argument. Why are you resorting to a personal attack?
- quink 4y agoAutonomous Driving Lanes world-wide: 0 kilometres. > so they would not be a very good replacement for autonomous driving lanes. Railways world-wide: 1,400,000 kilometres. > Why are you resorting to a personal attack? Are you seriously considering my putting out there that your personal experiences might influence your arguments to the point of not being credible a personal attack?