3 ms·
If the security forces were smart and wanted a good leader that wouldn't destroy the country, they'd kill those guys too. Do you really think it's better to ju
by midoridensha 4y ago
If the security forces were smart and wanted a good leader that wouldn't destroy the country, they'd kill those guys too.
Do you really think it's better to just let a horrible leader keep leading, because there's a chance the next guy will be worse? Even if he is, the chaos of transition should make it easier to cut his reign very short and choose again.
- boeingUH60 4y agoThe point is it’s never that simple…what you’re proposing is a full revolution, which is very difficult to pull off and not to talk of transitioning to another regime peacefully. I’m not sure if you’re a westerner but one of the issues I notice with people in western developed countries is thinking it’s easy to just fix the government. I live in a country similar to Russia and the issue is that taking out the leader won’t suffice because the entire system is corrupt from top to bottom. You know why those security forces continue to just do their jobs? It’s better to live under a tyrant within a governmental system than in a chaotic failed state.
- int_19h 4y agoThere's quite a few people in the Russian security and military forces who think that Putin isn't going far enough, if anything. If Russia actually has a successful coup, I'd say it's a decent change that the new guy will be worse than Putin in all respects. The more extreme forces are more likely to try, and probably more likely to succeed if they do.
- midoridensha 4y agoOther than resorting to nukes, how much farther can they even go? Their military is gutted at this point.
- int_19h 4y agoRussia hasn't had a true total mobilization yet, so there are still bodies to throw at the enemy. And, well, nukes aren't exactly off limits to the kind of people I'm talking about, either.