4 ms·
Is this the first time this system has failed so spectacularly? While the failure is notable, it does speak to the uptime of this system.
by noobermin 4y ago
Is this the first time this system has failed so spectacularly? While the failure is notable, it does speak to the uptime of this system.
- thrdbndndn 4y agoI agree. Not exactly that we need to praise them or anything, but I think sarcastic tone in some replies ("if only they did something BASIC") aren't needed.
- kilotaras 4y agoIt's a different tradeoff. Systems that fails and *executes recovery path* from time to time tend to be more resilient to catastrophic failures. Ideally you would want the combination of both: system doesn't usually crash/fail, but you force it to do so regularly. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_engineering https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_engineering
- ilyt 4y agoUptime is kinda moot measure. If it had uptime of 2 days but only went down for a minute at a time that would not be a problem