I'm not a huge fan of arguing for or against the sort of straw man you've hypothesized here, but, if pressed, I'd describe that imaginary person (who I must str

I'm not a huge fan of arguing for or against the sort of straw man you've hypothesized here, but, if pressed, I'd describe that imaginary person (who I must stress is indeed a weak straw man indeed) as someone not fully familiar with any aspect of history or humanity beyond undying loyalty to their beliefs (which are also a cumulatively developed secondary straw man generated in this hypothetical scenario which is, to my knowledge, not held by any actual person regardless of the assumed intent you may impart), and who may or may not be persuaded to reconsider otherwise when faced with even the slightest bit of welcomed antagonism. That is to say, I don't know how to play in your fantasy world, since you have not developed it very well.