3 ms·
Fair. My point was largely that it doesn't "know" or "understand" anything itself, in order to draw conclusions; it merely has a whole lot of text in it and a m
by danaris 4y ago
Fair. My point was largely that it doesn't "know" or "understand" anything itself, in order to draw conclusions; it merely has a whole lot of text in it and a model that allows it to associate that text very convincingly to look like it knows stuff. Thus, any answer it gives on a question like this will not be based on a comprehensive analysis of data, but rather on what the model predicts people would most likely say about the subject.
- wolverine876 4y agoI think it's a good point, and I hate to nitpick, but a precise understanding of ChatGPT and related tech is critical. > the model predicts people would most likely say about the subject Is that truly the design and the output? What "people"? Is "most likely" the goal or output? Is it structured by subject? Maybe you know, but many people are leaping to conclusions.