Yep, this is a pretty glaring flaw of any ideology that tries to reduce ethics to property. Any such ideology is using a sleight of hand by pretending as if pro

Yep, this is a pretty glaring flaw of any ideology that tries to reduce ethics to property. Any such ideology is using a sleight of hand by pretending as if property is a simpler or more fundamental notion than ethics. Any time you hear an argument like "you should be able to do whatever you want as long as you're not aggressing against another person or their property" you should ask them whether they think all possible distributions of property are equally ethical.