This honestly does not surprise me. The internet already has a precedent around paying for namespace, and it makes sense when you apply it to social media for t

This honestly does not surprise me. The internet already has a precedent around paying for namespace, and it makes sense when you apply it to social media for the same purposes. That being said, nobody is going to be happy about this on Twitter. It's another thing they've taken for granted being made dilute under Musk, rather than focusing on the value-add of their optional subscription. It's an interesting situation for sure. Calling all frogs: assume boiling position!